Health Promotion Practice

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

The Diabetes Educator

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dodge, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Clark, N. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Dodge, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Clark, N. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Health Promotion Practice, Vol. 3, No. 1, 30-42 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/152483990200300105
© 2002 Society for Public Health Education

The Evolution of an Innovative Heart Disease Management Program for Older Women: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in Practice

Julia A. Dodge, MS, RN

Department of Health Behavior and Health Education in the School of Public Health at the University of Michigan

Nancy K. Janz, PhD, RN

Department of Health Behavior and Health Education in the School of Public Health at the University of Michigan

Noreen M. Clark, PhD

School of Public Health at the University of Michigan

Few studies in the literature describe how to combine quantitative and qualitative methods to enhance the development of health education interventions. This article describes the evolution and refinement of an innovative disease management program "take PRIDE" for older adults with heart disease. Over 15 years, information obtained from data collection methods including telephone interviews, focus groups, face-to-face interviews, and program process data illuminated and guided subsequent refinement of the program and led to new iterations for different participants. Qualitative and quantitative data were incorporated into the two key areas of program development (theoretical framework, objectives, format, and content) and evaluation (evaluation design, sampling, and measurement). Combining both types of data enhanced the opportunity to detect needed program changes, to increase understanding of the mechanisms by which the program effects were produced, and to enhance the relevance of the program to different groups of program participants.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
M. G. Ory, P. J. Jordan, and T. Bazzarre
The Behavior Change Consortium: setting the stage for a new century of health behavior-change research
Health Educ. Res., October 1, 2002; 17(5): 500 - 511.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]