Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

The Diabetes Educator

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Health Promotion Practice
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wallerstein, N.
Right arrow Articles by Maltrud, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wallerstein, N.
Right arrow Articles by Maltrud, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Participatory Evaluation Model for Coalitions: The Development of Systems Indicators

Nina Wallerstein, DrPH

Department of Family and Community Medicine at the University of New Mexico School of Medicine in Albuquerque

Michele Polascek, PhD, MHS

Kristine Maltrud, MPH

This article presents the evolution of a comprehensive participatory coalition evaluation model and a workbook that emerged from a 6-year Healthier Communities initiative in New Mexico. Despite the explosion of interest in a new paradigm for coalition evaluation, few models in the literature encompass coalition effectiveness, capacity and health outcomes, and a dynamic process of community participation. The New Mexico model features a participatory evaluation process that emphasizes community system changes and population health changes. Several community case stories illustrate the difficulties and potentials of using the participatory evaluation model. Lessons learned include the need for guiding principles so that issues such as power relationships and collaborative decision making are "above board," understanding the complexity of coalition evaluation, the need to clarify evaluator roles to enhance buy-in, the use of a logic model to clarify a common vision of change, and the importance of using community-friendly, jargon-free language.

Health Promotion Practice, Vol. 3, No. 3, 361-373 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/152483990200300306


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
M. C. Kegler, B. L. Norton, and R. Aronson
Skill improvement among coalition members in the California Healthy Cities and Communities Program
Health Educ. Res., June 1, 2007; 22(3): 450 - 457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HEALTH PROMOT INTHome page
T. A. Abma
Responsive evaluation in health promotion: its value for ambiguous contexts
Health Promot. Int., December 1, 2005; 20(4): 391 - 397.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. PsychiatryHome page
K. Wells, J. Miranda, M. L. Bruce, M. Alegria, and N. Wallerstein
Bridging Community Intervention and Mental Health Services Research
Am J Psychiatry, June 1, 2004; 161(6): 955 - 963.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]