Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Health Promotion Practice
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jones, K. S.
Right arrow Articles by Burkett, L. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Jones, K. S.
Right arrow Articles by Burkett, L. N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Comparison of Instructional Methods for Weight Loss in Women

Katherine S. Jones, PhD

Arizona State University East, Mesa

Lee N. Burkett, PhD

Arizona State University East, Mesa

This study tested effects of three methods for delivering a weight-loss education program for women. Seventy-four predominantly White participants at least 10 pounds over healthy weight began the program. Their average age was 41.7 years (range = 19 to 73), weight 173 pounds, Body Mass Index (BMI) 29.36, and waist/hip ratio .77. Participants were randomly placed into three groups: classroom (24), textbook (25), or computer program (25). The curriculum for all participants was taken from the same weight-loss manual, and all participants completed the same weekly assignments. Participants’ weight loss, BMI, and waist/hip ratios were compared at the end of the program. Weight loss (F = 29.4, p < .001; 2, 102 DF), reduction in BMI (F = 29.5, p < .001; 2, 102 DF]), and waist/hip ratio reduction (F = 3.11, p < .05; 2, 102 DF) across all groups were significant. There were no significant group differences in weight loss, BMI, waist/hip ratio reduction, or drop-out rates.

Health Promotion Practice, Vol. 3, No. 4, 501-506 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/152483902236720


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?