Health Promotion Practice

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

The Diabetes Educator

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hann, N. E.
Right arrow Articles by Sterling, T. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hann, N. E.
Right arrow Articles by Sterling, T. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Health Promotion Practice, Vol. 5, No. 4, 377-381 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1524839903259496
© 2004 Society for Public Health Education

Policy and Environmental Change: New Directions for Public Health

Neil E. Hann, MPH, CHES

Oklahoma Department of Health in Oklahoma City.

Thomas J. Kean, MPH

Englewood, Colorado.

Rose Marie Matulionis, MSPH

Directors of Health Promotion and Education in Washington, D.C.

Carol M. Russell, MPH

Destin, Florida.

Terrie D. Sterling, PhD

Site Activities Branch, Division of Health Education and Promotion, at the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry in Atlanta, Georgia.

Solving major, persistent public health problems requires new policies and more aggressive, sweeping interventions that affect large populations. We need well-conceived health policies and effective interventions for environmental change, but are we likely to get them? To find out, the Directors of Health Promotion and Education and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention initiated a study of state and local public health agencies in the United States from 1996 through 1999. Data were collected by peer- and non-peer-reviewed literature searches, key informant interviews, reviews of Internet sites, and a nationwide survey. Study conclusions found confusion about the legitimacy of advocacy, lack of priority and funding for interventions that take more time versus quick fixes, variable leadership, reluctance to take risks, and a political climate that often discourages government agencies to take on these interventions. There are successes, yet more can be done.

Key Words: health policy • environmental change • public health education


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Promot PractHome page
J. Emery, C. Crump, and M. Hawkins
Formative Evaluation of AARP's Active for Life(R) Campaign to Improve Walking and Bicycling Environments in Two Cities
Health Promot Pract, October 1, 2007; 8(4): 403 - 414.
[Abstract] [PDF]