Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

The Diabetes Educator

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Health Promotion Practice
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1524839906292587v1
8/3/299    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Greene, G. W.
Right arrow Articles by Peterson, K. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Greene, G. W.
Right arrow Articles by Peterson, K. E.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Qualitative Study of a Nutrition Working Group

Geoffrey W. Greene, PhD, RD, LDN

Department of Nutrition and Food Sciences at the University of Rhode Island in Kingston, Rhode Island

Linda C. Nebeling, PhD, MPH, RD, FADA

Health Promotion Research Branch, Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences at the National Cancer Institute in Bethesda, Maryland

Mary L. Greaney, PhD

Department of Nutrition at the Harvard School of Public Health in Boston, Massachusetts

Ana C. Lindsay, DDS, DrPH, MPH

Public Health Nutrition, Department of Nutrition at the Harvard School of Public Health in Boston, Massachusetts

Cary K. Hardwick, MA, MSN, RN, MS

Department of Nutrition at the Harvard School of Public Health in Boston, Massachusetts

Deborah J. Toobert, PhD

Oregon Research Institute in Eugene, Oregon

Ken Resnicow, PhD

School of Public Health at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, Michigan

Geoffrey C. Williams, MD, PhD

University of Rochester in Rochester, New York

Diane L. Elliot, MD, FACP, FACSM

Division of Health Promotion and Sports Medicine at the Oregon Health and Science University in Portland, Oregon

Tamara Goldman Sher, PhD

Illinois Institute of Technology, Institute of Psychology, in Chicago, Illinois

Holly A. McGregor, PhD

Rossingdale, Massachusetts

Andrea Domas, MS, RD

Rush Nutrition and Wellness Center in Chicago, Illinois

Carol A. DeFrancesco, MA, RD

Division of Health Promotion and Sports Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University in Portland, Oregon

Karen E. Peterson, ScD, RD

Departments of Nutrition and of Society, Human Development, and Health at Harvard School of Public Health in Boston, Massachusetts

The Behavioral Change Consortium (BCC) Nutrition Workgroup (NWG) is a multidisciplinary collaboration of representatives from BCC sites and federal agencies. Its mission is to improve measurement of dietary variables. This article presents findings from a qualitative study of perceived effectiveness of the workgroup collaboration. Twelve in-depth interviews were conducted and examined for common themes using the constant comparison method. Themes contributing to perceived effectiveness included: funding and additional resources; invested, committed, and collegial members; strong leadership, clearly articulated goals, and regular communication. Influences seen as reducing effectiveness were: distance, disparate nature of the studies, limited time, and problems associated with starting collaboration after the primary studies had begun data collection. NWG members felt that the workgroup would continue to be successful; however, there were concerns about responsibility for writing and authorship of manuscripts and the need for continued funding to ensure full participation and productivity.

Key Words: working group • qualitative research • collaboration • transdisciplinary teams

This version was published on July 1, 2007

Health Promotion Practice, Vol. 8, No. 3, 299-306 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1524839906292587
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Nutr.Home page
L. Nebeling
Preface
J. Nutr., January 1, 2008; 138(1): 181S - 182S.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Nutr.Home page
R. E. Davis, K. Resnicow, A. A. Atienza, K. E. Peterson, A. Domas, A. Hunt, T. G. Hurley, A. L. Yaroch, G. W. Greene, T. Goldman Sher, et al.
Use of Signal Detection Methodology to Identify Subgroups of Dietary Supplement Use in Diverse Populations
J. Nutr., January 1, 2008; 138(1): 205S - 211S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Nutr.Home page
K. E. Peterson, J. R. Hebert, T. G. Hurley, K. Resnicow, F. E. Thompson, G. W. Greene, A. R. Shaikh, A. L. Yaroch, G. C. Williams, J. Salkeld, et al.
Accuracy and Precision of Two Short Screeners to Assess Change in Fruit and Vegetable Consumption among Diverse Populations Participating in Health Promotion Intervention Trials
J. Nutr., January 1, 2008; 138(1): 218S - 225S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]