Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Health Promotion Practice
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Helitzer, D.
Right arrow Articles by Fluder, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Helitzer, D.
Right arrow Articles by Fluder, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Development of a Planning and Evaluation Methodology for Assessing the Contribution of Theory to a Diabetes Prevention Lifestyle Intervention

Deborah Helitzer, ScD

Department of Family and Community Medicine and School of Medicine at the University of New Mexico, in Albuquerque, New Mexico

Arlana Bobo Peterson, MPH

Research, Development and Accountability Department of Albuquerque Public Schools, in Albuquerque, New Mexico

Janice Thompson, PhD

Department of Exercise and Health Sciences at the University of Bristol, in Bristol, England

Shannon Fluder, BA

Office of Evaluation, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of New Mexico, in Albuquerque, New Mexico

The benefits of utilizing and measuring application of theory for behavior change programs are numerous, including the emergence of new theories and theoretically bound strategies. Despite recent attempts to make theory use more salient, there remains a dearth of practical frameworks for the development and evaluation of theory-based programs. Without literature documenting how theories have been specifically applied to interventions and their evaluation, health educators may not be well prepared to utilize theory for the design, implementation, or as a focus of the evaluation. Using a case study example of a diabetes prevention program, this article describes how theory was used for the program design and the evaluation and provides a framework for using theory in other programs. Issues discussed include: the challenges in successfully utilizing theory for intervention development and the processes of developing theoretically based instruments.

Key Words: theory-based programs • behavior change • diabetes • evaluation

References

  • Bandura, A. (2004). Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Education & Behavior, 31(2), 143-164.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Baranowski, T., Perry, C., & Parcel, G. (1997). How individuals, environments, and health behavior interact: Social cognitive theory. In K. Glanz, F. M. Lewis, & B. Rimer (Eds.), Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed., pp. 153-178). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Bartholomew, L.K., Parcel, G.S., & Kok, G. (1998). Intervention mapping: A process for developing theory- and evidence-based health education programs. Health Education & Behavior, 25(5), 545-563.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Bellg, A.J., Borrelli, B., Resnik, B., Hecht, J., Minicucci, D.S., Ory, M., et al. (2004). Enhancing treatment fidelity in health behavior change studies: Best practices and recommendations from the NIH Behavior Change Consortium. Health Psychology, 23(5), 443-451.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Best, A., Stokols, D., Green, L.W., Leischow, S., Holmes, B., & Buckholtz, K. (2003). An integrative framework for community partnering to translate theory into effective health promotion strategy. American Journal of Health Promotion, 18(2), 168-176.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Bickman, L. (1987). The functions of program theory. In L. Bickman (Ed.), Using program theory in evaluation. New directions for program evaluation. (pp. 5-18). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Chen, H. (1990). Theory-driven evaluations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Clarke, A., & Dawson, R. (1999). Evaluation research. London: Sage.
  • DiClemente, R. J., Crosby, R. A., & Kegler, M. C. (Eds.). (2003). Emerging theories in health promotion practice and research: Strategies for improving public health. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • D'Onofrio, C.N. (1992). Theory and the empowerment of health education practitioners. Health Education Quarterly, 19, 385-403.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Estabrooks, P., Dzewaltowski, D.A., Glasgow, R.E., & Klesges, L.M. (2003). Reporting of validity from school health promotion studies in 12 leading journals, 1996-2000. Journal of School Health, 73(1), 21-28.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Field, A., Colditz, G., Fox, M.K., Byers, T., Serdula, M., Bosch, R.J., et al. (1998). Comparison of 4 questionnaires for assessment of fruit and vegetable intake. American Journal of Public Health, 88(8), 1216-1218.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Gilliland, S.S., Azen, S.P., Perez, G.E., & Carter, J.S. (2002). Strong in body and spirit. Lifestyle intervention for Native American adults with diabetes in New Mexico. Diabetes Care, 25(1), 78-83.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Glanz, K., Rimer, B. K., & Lewis, F. M. (Eds.). (2002). Health behavior and health education: Theory research and practice (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Glasgow, R.E., Bull, S.S., Gillette, C., Klesges, L.M., & Dzewaltowski, D.A. (2002). Behavior change intervention research in healthcare settings: A review of recent reports with emphasis on external validity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 23(1), 62-69.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Glasgow, R.E., Klesges, L.M., Dzewaltowski, D.A., Bull, S.S., & Estabrooks, P. (2004). The future of health behavior change research: What is needed to improve translation of research into health promotion practice? Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 27(1), 3-13.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Green, J. (2000). The role of theory in evidence-based health promotion practice [Editorial]. Health Education Research: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 125-129.[Free Full Text]
  • Green, L.W. (2001). From research to best practices in other populations and settings. American Journal of Health Behavior, 25(3), 165-178.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Green, L.W., Glanz, K., Hochbaum, G.M., Kok, G., Kreuter, M.W., Lewis, F.M., et al. (1994). Can we build on, or must we replace, the theories and models in health education? [Editorial]. Health Education Research: Theory and Practice, 9(3) 397-404.[Free Full Text]
  • Green, L.W., & Kreuter, M.W. (1999). Health promotion planning: An educational and ecological approach (3rd ed.). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
  • Helitzer, D., Davis, S., Gittelsohn, J., Going, S., Murray, D., Snyder, P., et al. (1999). Process evaluation in a multisite, primary obesity-prevention trial in American Indian schoolchildren. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 69, 816S-824S.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Judge, K., & Bauld, L. (2001). Strong theory, flexible methods: Evaluating complex community-based initiatives. Critical Public Health, 11(1), 19-38.[CrossRef]
  • Kirby, D. (1995). A review of educational programs designed to reduce sexual risk-taking behaviors among school-aged youth in the United States. Springfield, VA: National Technical Information Services.
  • Lytle, L.A., & Perry, C.L. (2001). Applying research and theory in program planning: An example from a nutrition education intervention. Health Promotion Practice, 2, 68-80.[Abstract]
  • Nigg, C.R., Allegrante, J.P., & Ory, M. (2002). Theory-comparison and multiple-behavior research: Common themes advancing health behavior research. Health Education Research: Theory and Practice, 17(5), 670-679.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Ory, M.G., Jordan, P.J., & Bazzarre, T. (2002). The Behavior Change Consortium: Setting the stage for a new century of health behavior-change research. Health Education Research: Theory and Practice, 17(5), 500-511.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Rothman, A.J. (2004, July 27). "Is there nothing more practical than a good theory?" Why innovations and advances in health behavior change will arise if interventions are use to test and refine theory. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, pp.1-7.
  • Solomon, S., & Kington, R. (2002). National efforts to promote behavior-change research: Views from the Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research. Health Education Research: Theory and Practice, 17(5), 495-499.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Sorenson, J., & Steckler, A. (2002). Improving the health of the public: A behavior-change perspective [Editorial]. Health Education Research: Theory and Practice, 17(5), 493-494.[Free Full Text]
  • Steckler, A., & Linnan, L. (2002). Process evaluation for public health interventions and research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Weiss, C.H. (1998). Evaluation: Methods for studying programs and policies (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Willging, C., Helitzer, D., & Thompson, J. (2006). "Sharing wisdom": Lessons learned during the development of a diabetes prevention intervention for urban American Indian women. Evaluation and Program Planning, 29(2), 130-140.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • W. K. Kellogg Foundation. (2001). Using logic models to bring together planning, evaluation and action: Logic model development guide (Publication #1209). Battle Creek, MI: Author.

This version was published on October 1, 2008

Health Promotion Practice, Vol. 9, No. 4, 404-414 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1524839906289076


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Helitzer, D.
Right arrow Articles by Fluder, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Helitzer, D.
Right arrow Articles by Fluder, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?